Sign in
NC Coastline. North Carolina Coastal News.
From the Outer Banks to the Brunswick Islands

State seeks input on nine potential oyster reef sites before 2027 work

Marine fisheries staff are asking commercial and recreational stakeholders to comment by November 23 on nine candidate sites for future oyster habitat enhancement, not already-approved final locations.

MOREHEAD CITY – North Carolina marine fisheries officials are asking people who use coastal shellfish waters to weigh in on nine potential oyster-reef enhancement sites ahead of work tentatively planned for 2027.

The Division of Marine Fisheries’ Cultch Planting Program says its stakeholder survey will remain open through November 23. The department is especially seeking input from the commercial hand-harvest and mechanical oyster fisheries, along with other recreational and commercial users whose activities may interact with proposed reef locations.

Oyster habitat in an official North Carolina Division of Marine Fisheries program photograph. File image, not a photograph of an approved 2027 site.

The nine sites are prospective, not finalized. Officials say they were selected following surveys that screened against existing shellfish assemblages and submerged aquatic vegetation. The comments will help staff evaluate harvest preferences and potential impacts on other water users before determining future placements.

Cultch planting generally creates a shallow layer of oyster shell, limestone rock or similar material on the bottom, providing a hard surface on which oyster larvae can settle. The agency describes a thin placement under one foot in its October 8 explanation.

Any new reef may later support public harvest, but a candidate location’s appearance in the consultation does not guarantee a project will be built there or specify when a harvest opportunity will open.

Water users who rely on specific channels, docks or fishing grounds should review the official survey and associated site information while the department is still accepting feedback.

Source(s)